On 25/12/14 03:41PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > > Does this build for anyone else? > None that I'm aware of. I investigated this a while ago: * This is a known issue: https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/393136104 The commonly shared and dirty fix involves patching bazel/build_defs.bzl - which contains a bunch of flags to pass to the compiler *including Werror* - and pass `-Wno-error=c23-extensions'. This is at least what FreeBSD and Fedora are doing. Using BUILDLINK_TRANSFORM could be a possible workaround but IIRC it didn't work on my side. * There is an open PR (pkg/59590) for bazel on GNATS.[1] Likely, tsutsui reported it because bazel breaks japanese input related packages. [1] https://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-bugs/2025/08/12/msg074234.html * The issue was brought up on tech-pkg, and ryo replied clarifying what's holding back an apparently simple fix.[2] Our bazel package uses a custom distfile with all the patches already applied, so hypothetically, to keep this patch-less setup as it is, the fix should applied before rebuilding the tarball. It's not clear why doing this requires a Linux environment. https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-pkg/2025/08/08/msg031433.html -- PVO | https://retrobsd.ddns.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature